Performance Reviews Unmasked: Managers in the Corporate Thunderdome
Prepare for a harsh reality: within the confines of performance reviews, a cutthroat scenario akin to the Thunderdome unfolds, where two managers enter, but only one emerges victorious. It's a corporate bloodbath. As a manager, my goal was to uplift and advance my teams, celebrating their accomplishments and fostering growth. While I did influence these aspects to some extent, managerial authority often faces constraints in many organizations, especially concerning performance evaluations. Managers frequently find themselves in a tough spot, torn between dissatisfied employees and directives from top management, who prefer positive perceptions.
In our recent discussion about performance reviews, we explored the evolving trends for employees. Recognizing another group affected by performance evaluations is the managers themselves is crucial. Despite overseeing daily operations and ensuring team objectives are met, managers often lack the complete control over the evaluation process assumed by many. They become targets for senior leadership and bear the brunt of employee discontent. Let's empathize with our leaders during this performance review period, as they often cannot share certain details without jeopardizing their positions.
Here are three prevalent misconceptions surrounding managers and performance reviews:
Many assume that managers hold complete authority over performance reviews. Managers are often overruled or instructed not to rate employees highly, compromising trust and their leadership effectiveness.
There is a mistaken belief that managers can promote employees or recommend them for promotions. However, the promotion process involves intricate dynamics, resembling a competitive arena where managers vie for limited promotion opportunities.
It is commonly thought that managers dictate salary raises. In truth, negotiating during hiring is pivotal, as substantial raises are infrequent. New employees might not receive a raise during their initial performance review cycle, and managers have limited sway in this process.
Above all, I want to emphasize that while managers have flaws, their employees and senior leaders sometimes hold them to unattainable standards. Unrealistic expectations abound, hindering their ability to foster employee growth. It is unfair for senior leadership to burden managers without taking responsibility themselves.
Engaging in open and candid conversations with your manager is valuable as an employee. While they support you, shedding light on these issues can aid them, clarifying that not every challenge stems from managerial shortcomings.
Eager to learn more? Contact us today.
